Which of the following facts must be proven for a lender to prevail in a state-law negligent misrepresentation action against a CPA who prepared a borrower's tax return that was disclosed to the lender?

Which of the following facts must be proven for a lender to prevail in a state-law negligent misrepresentation action against a CPA who prepared a borrower's tax return that was disclosed to the lender?


The plaintiff justifiably relied on the misrepresentations.

Sun Corp. approved a merger plan with Cord Corp. Factors in approving the merger were the tax returns of Cord prepared by Frank & Co., CPAs. Sun had required Cord to disclose its tax returns and audited financial statements as a condition of the merger. Frank knew of this condition before it prepared returns that contained irregularities that later caused Sun to suffer substantial losses. For Frank to be liable for common law negligence, Sun, at a minimum, must prove that Frank

Sun Corp. approved a merger plan with Cord Corp. Factors in approving the merger were the tax returns of Cord prepared by Frank & Co., CPAs. Sun had required Cord to disclose its tax returns and audited financial statements as a condition of the merger. Frank knew of this condition before it prepared returns that contained irregularities that later caused Sun to suffer substantial losses. For Frank to be liable for common law negligence, Sun, at a minimum, must prove that Frank



Failed to exercise due care.

Plaintiff acquired a security issued under a registration statement that contained a material misstatement of facts. In a suit by Plaintiff under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 against the issuer's auditor,

Plaintiff acquired a security issued under a registration statement that contained a material misstatement of facts. In a suit by Plaintiff under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 against the issuer's auditor,



Plaintiff need not prove intent or causation by the defendant.

Under the Section 10(b) Rule 10b-5 antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following conditions must a plaintiff prove to recover damages from an accountant?

Under the Section 10(b) Rule 10b-5 antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following conditions must a plaintiff prove to recover damages from an accountant?



The plaintiff relied on the accountant's intentional misstatement of material facts.

The partnership of Rodgers & Higgs, CPAs, performed audits of Alt Corp., a publicly-traded company, for the past several years. After issuing the current year's audit report, the CFO of Alt confessed to having committed fraud against Alt. Under which of the following statutes would the investors most likely bring suit against Rodgers & Higgs?

The partnership of Rodgers & Higgs, CPAs, performed audits of Alt Corp., a publicly-traded company, for the past several years. After issuing the current year's audit report, the CFO of Alt confessed to having committed fraud against Alt. Under which of the following statutes would the investors most likely bring suit against Rodgers & Higgs?



Securities Exchange Act of 1934, if they can prove scienter.

What defense must an accountant establish to be absolved from civil liability under Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for false or misleading statements made in reports or documents filed under the act?

What defense must an accountant establish to be absolved from civil liability under Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for false or misleading statements made in reports or documents filed under the act?



Good faith and lack of knowledge of the statement's falsity.

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a person is liable for making a false or misleading statement (or omission) of a material fact in an SEC filing (Section 18). Moreover, defrauding anyone in the purchase or sale of any security is illegal (Section 10). Under these provisions, a plaintiff must bring a suit within

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a person is liable for making a false or misleading statement (or omission) of a material fact in an SEC filing (Section 18). Moreover, defrauding anyone in the purchase or sale of any security is illegal (Section 10). Under these provisions, a plaintiff must bring a suit within



The earlier of 2 years after discovery of the facts on which the suit is based or 5 years after the cause of action arose.

In which of the following situations is an accountant considered to have aided and abetted violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?

In which of the following situations is an accountant considered to have aided and abetted violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?



I. The accountant is generally aware of his or her participation in an improper activity or knowingly aids the activity.
II. The accountant is generally aware of his or her participation in an improper activity and knowingly aids the activity.
III. The accountant observes the activity and remains silent. This may constitute abetting.
II only.

Dean, Inc., a publicly traded corporation, paid a $10,000 bribe to a local zoning official. The bribe was recorded in Dean's financial statements as a consulting fee. Dean's unaudited financial statements were submitted to the SEC as part of a quarterly filing on Form 10-Q. Which of the following federal statutes did Dean violate?

Dean, Inc., a publicly traded corporation, paid a $10,000 bribe to a local zoning official. The bribe was recorded in Dean's financial statements as a consulting fee. Dean's unaudited financial statements were submitted to the SEC as part of a quarterly filing on Form 10-Q. Which of the following federal statutes did Dean violate?



Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Which of the following circumstances is a defense to an accountant's liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for misstatements and omissions of material facts contained in a registration statement?

Which of the following circumstances is a defense to an accountant's liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for misstatements and omissions of material facts contained in a registration statement?



Due diligence on the part of the accountant.

Pick, CPA, was engaged by Edge Corp. to audit Edge's financial statements. Pick, in performing the audit and rendering an unmodified opinion, intentionally ignored several material omissions in the financial statements. Edge included Pick's auditor's report in its annual filing with the SEC and in its annual stockholders' report. Drane purchased shares of Edge stock based on Drane's review of the past performance of the stock and current-year financial statements. When the omissions in the financial statements became known, the value of Edge stock declined and Drane suffered a loss. Under the provisions of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, what will be the result of a suit by Drane against Pick?

Pick, CPA, was engaged by Edge Corp. to audit Edge's financial statements. Pick, in performing the audit and rendering an unmodified opinion, intentionally ignored several material omissions in the financial statements. Edge included Pick's auditor's report in its annual filing with the SEC and in its annual stockholders' report. Drane purchased shares of Edge stock based on Drane's review of the past performance of the stock and current-year financial statements. When the omissions in the financial statements became known, the value of Edge stock declined and Drane suffered a loss. Under the provisions of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, what will be the result of a suit by Drane against Pick?



Drane will win because Pick acted with intent.

Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, a CPA may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the security's registration statement. Under Section 11, a CPA usually will not be liable to the purchaser

Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, a CPA may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the security's registration statement. Under Section 11, a CPA usually will not be liable to the purchaser



If the CPA can prove due diligence.

Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, an auditor may help to establish the defense of due diligence if

Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, an auditor may help to establish the defense of due diligence if



I. The auditor performed an additional review of the audited statements to ensure that the statements were accurate as of the effective date of a registration statement.
II. The auditor complied with GAAS or other applicable professional standards.
Both I and II.

Jay Co., CPAs, audited the financial statements of Maco Corp. Jay intentionally expressed an unmodified opinion on the financial statements even though material misstatements were discovered. The financial statements and Jay's unmodified opinion were included in a registration statement and prospectus for an original public offering of Maco stock. Which of the following statements is true regarding Jay's liability to a purchaser of the offering under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?

Jay Co., CPAs, audited the financial statements of Maco Corp. Jay intentionally expressed an unmodified opinion on the financial statements even though material misstatements were discovered. The financial statements and Jay's unmodified opinion were included in a registration statement and prospectus for an original public offering of Maco stock. Which of the following statements is true regarding Jay's liability to a purchaser of the offering under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?



A.Jay will be liable if the purchaser relied on Jay's unmodified opinion on the financial statements.

Under the provisions of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following activities must be proven by a stock purchaser in a suit against a CPA?

Under the provisions of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following activities must be proven by a stock purchaser in a suit against a CPA?



I. Intentional conduct by the CPA designed to deceive investors
II. Negligence by the CPA
I only.

Hugh Gibson is suing Simpson & Sloan, CPAs, to recover losses incurred in connection with Gibson's transactions in Zebra Corporation securities. Zebra's annual Form 10-K report contained material false and misleading statements in the financial statements audited by Simpson & Sloan. To recover under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Gibson must, among other things, establish that

Hugh Gibson is suing Simpson & Sloan, CPAs, to recover losses incurred in connection with Gibson's transactions in Zebra Corporation securities. Zebra's annual Form 10-K report contained material false and misleading statements in the financial statements audited by Simpson & Sloan. To recover under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Gibson must, among other things, establish that



He relied upon the financial statements in his decision to purchase or sell Zebra securities.

Petty Corp. made a public offering subject to the Securities Act of 1933. In connection with the offering, Ward & Co., CPAs, rendered an unmodified opinion on Petty's financial statements included in the SEC registration statement. Huff purchased 500 of the offered shares. Huff has brought an action against Ward under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for losses resulting from misstatements of facts in the financial statements included in the registration statement. Ward's weakest defense is that

Petty Corp. made a public offering subject to the Securities Act of 1933. In connection with the offering, Ward & Co., CPAs, rendered an unmodified opinion on Petty's financial statements included in the SEC registration statement. Huff purchased 500 of the offered shares. Huff has brought an action against Ward under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for losses resulting from misstatements of facts in the financial statements included in the registration statement. Ward's weakest defense is that



Ward was not in privity of contract with Huff.

Quincy bought Teal Corp. common stock in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Worth & Co., CPAs, expressed an unmodified opinion on Teal's financial statements that were included in the registration statement filed with the SEC. Quincy sued Worth under the provisions of the 1933 act that deal with omission of facts required to be in the registration statement. Quincy must prove that

Quincy bought Teal Corp. common stock in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Worth & Co., CPAs, expressed an unmodified opinion on Teal's financial statements that were included in the registration statement filed with the SEC. Quincy sued Worth under the provisions of the 1933 act that deal with omission of facts required to be in the registration statement. Quincy must prove that



There was a material misstatement in the financial statements.

Under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following penalties could be assessed against a CPA who intentionally violated the provisions of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 of the act?

Under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following penalties could be assessed against a CPA who intentionally violated the provisions of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 of the act?



Civil Liability for Monetary Damages- YES
Criminal Liability for a Fine- YES

Burt, CPA, issued an unmodified opinion on the financial statements of Midwest Corp. These financial statements were included in Midwest's annual report, and Form 10-K was filed with the SEC. As a result of Burt's reckless disregard for GAAS, material misstatements in the financial statements were not detected. Subsequently, Davis purchased stock in Midwest in the secondary market without ever seeing Midwest's annual report or Form 10-K. Shortly thereafter, Midwest became insolvent, and the price of the stock declined drastically. Davis sued Burt for damages based on Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Burt's best defense is that

Burt, CPA, issued an unmodified opinion on the financial statements of Midwest Corp. These financial statements were included in Midwest's annual report, and Form 10-K was filed with the SEC. As a result of Burt's reckless disregard for GAAS, material misstatements in the financial statements were not detected. Subsequently, Davis purchased stock in Midwest in the secondary market without ever seeing Midwest's annual report or Form 10-K. Shortly thereafter, Midwest became insolvent, and the price of the stock declined drastically. Davis sued Burt for damages based on Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Burt's best defense is that



Davis did not rely on the financial statements or Form 10-K.

Ocean and Associates, CPAs, audited the financial statements of Drain Corporation. As a result of Ocean's negligence in conducting the audit, the financial statements included material misstatements. Ocean was unaware of this fact. The financial statements and Ocean's unmodified opinion were included in a registration statement and prospectus for an original public offering of stock by Drain. Sharp purchased shares in the offering. Sharp received a copy of the prospectus prior to the purchase but did not read it. The shares declined in value as a result of the misstatements in Drain's financial statements becoming known. Under which of the following acts is Sharp most likely to prevail in a lawsuit against Ocean?

Ocean and Associates, CPAs, audited the financial statements of Drain Corporation. As a result of Ocean's negligence in conducting the audit, the financial statements included material misstatements. Ocean was unaware of this fact. The financial statements and Ocean's unmodified opinion were included in a registration statement and prospectus for an original public offering of stock by Drain. Sharp purchased shares in the offering. Sharp received a copy of the prospectus prior to the purchase but did not read it. The shares declined in value as a result of the misstatements in Drain's financial statements becoming known. Under which of the following acts is Sharp most likely to prevail in a lawsuit against Ocean?



Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5- NO
Securities Act of 1933, Section 11- YES

Holly Corp. engaged Yost & Co., CPAs, to audit the financial statements to be included in a registration statement Holly was required to file under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933. Yost failed to exercise due diligence and did not discover the omission of a fact material to the statements. A purchaser of Holly's securities may recover from Yost under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 only if the purchaser

Holly Corp. engaged Yost & Co., CPAs, to audit the financial statements to be included in a registration statement Holly was required to file under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933. Yost failed to exercise due diligence and did not discover the omission of a fact material to the statements. A purchaser of Holly's securities may recover from Yost under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 only if the purchaser



Brings a civil action within 1 year of the discovery of the omission and within 3 years of the offering date.

How does the Securities Act of 1933, which imposes civil liability on auditors for misrepresentations or omissions of material facts in a registration statement, expand auditors' liability to purchasers of securities beyond that of common law?

How does the Securities Act of 1933, which imposes civil liability on auditors for misrepresentations or omissions of material facts in a registration statement, expand auditors' liability to purchasers of securities beyond that of common law?



Privity with purchasers is not a necessary element of proof.

Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, a CPA may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the security's registration statement. Under Section 11, which of the following must be proven by a purchaser of the security?

Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, a CPA may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the security's registration statement. Under Section 11, which of the following must be proven by a purchaser of the security?



Reliance on the Financial Statements- NO
Fraud by the CPA- NO

Craven was the CEO of Engines Plus, Inc., a publicly-traded company. Hanson, CPA, was the long-time controller for the company. Engines Plus was about to be sued in a class action suit for defective engines. Only Craven knew about the impending suit. On March 1, Craven told Hanson about the impending suit. On March 2, Craven told Spore, an old friend, about the suit. Spore knew that Craven was the CEO of Engines Plus. On March 3, Craven, Hanson, and Spore all sold the stock they owned in Engines Plus. On March 4, the class action suit was filed and the value of Engines Plus stock plummeted. Under the insider trading provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following statements is correct regarding Craven, Hanson, and Spore?

Craven was the CEO of Engines Plus, Inc., a publicly-traded company. Hanson, CPA, was the long-time controller for the company. Engines Plus was about to be sued in a class action suit for defective engines. Only Craven knew about the impending suit. On March 1, Craven told Hanson about the impending suit. On March 2, Craven told Spore, an old friend, about the suit. Spore knew that Craven was the CEO of Engines Plus. On March 3, Craven, Hanson, and Spore all sold the stock they owned in Engines Plus. On March 4, the class action suit was filed and the value of Engines Plus stock plummeted. Under the insider trading provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following statements is correct regarding Craven, Hanson, and Spore?



Craven and Hanson would be considered insiders and Spore would be considered a tippee, all with knowledge of material, nonpublic information.

James Fisk recently acquired Valiant Corporation by purchasing all of its outstanding stock pursuant to a tender offer. Fisk demanded and obtained the resignation of the existing board of directors and replaced it with his own slate of nominees. Under these circumstances,

James Fisk recently acquired Valiant Corporation by purchasing all of its outstanding stock pursuant to a tender offer. Fisk demanded and obtained the resignation of the existing board of directors and replaced it with his own slate of nominees. Under these circumstances,



If Valiant is listed on a national stock exchange, Fisk must file his tender offer with the SEC.

On May 1, Apel purchased 7% of Stork Corp.'s preferred stock traded on a national securities exchange. After the purchase, Apel owned 9% of the outstanding preferred stock. Stork is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. With respect to the purchase, Apel

On May 1, Apel purchased 7% of Stork Corp.'s preferred stock traded on a national securities exchange. After the purchase, Apel owned 9% of the outstanding preferred stock. Stork is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. With respect to the purchase, Apel



On May 1, Apel purchased 7% of Stork Corp.'s preferred stock traded on a national securities exchange. After the purchase, Apel owned 9% of the outstanding preferred stock. Stork is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. With respect to the purchase, Apel

Integral Corp. is subject to the reporting provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For its current fiscal year, Integral filed the following with the SEC: quarterly reports, an annual report, and a periodic report listing newly appointed officers of the corporation. Integral did not notify the SEC of shareholder "short-swing" profits, report that a competitor made a tender offer to Integral's shareholders, and report changes in the price of its stock as sold on the New York Stock Exchange. Under the SEC reporting requirements, which of the following was Integral required to do?

Integral Corp. is subject to the reporting provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For its current fiscal year, Integral filed the following with the SEC: quarterly reports, an annual report, and a periodic report listing newly appointed officers of the corporation. Integral did not notify the SEC of shareholder "short-swing" profits, report that a competitor made a tender offer to Integral's shareholders, and report changes in the price of its stock as sold on the New York Stock Exchange. Under the SEC reporting requirements, which of the following was Integral required to do?



File the periodic report listing newly appointed officers.

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following conditions generally will allow an issuer of securities to terminate the registration of a class of securities and suspend the duty to file periodic reports?

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following conditions generally will allow an issuer of securities to terminate the registration of a class of securities and suspend the duty to file periodic reports?



The Corporation Has Fewer Than 500 Shareholders- YES
The Securities Are Listed on a National Securities Exchange- NO

Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to companies whose securities are traded on a national exchange, what class of companies is subject to the SEC's registration requirements?

Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to companies whose securities are traded on a national exchange, what class of companies is subject to the SEC's registration requirements?



Companies with assets in excess of $10 million and 500 or more nonaccredited shareholders.

Integral Corp., with assets in excess of $4 million, has issued common and preferred stock and has 350 shareholders. Its stock is sold on the New York Stock Exchange. Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Integral must be registered with the SEC because

Integral Corp., with assets in excess of $4 million, has issued common and preferred stock and has 350 shareholders. Its stock is sold on the New York Stock Exchange. Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Integral must be registered with the SEC because



Its shares are listed on a national stock exchange.

Pax Co. is making a $7 million stock offering and wants the issue to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. Regulation D provides that Pax can offer

Pax Co. is making a $7 million stock offering and wants the issue to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. Regulation D provides that Pax can offer



$7 million of securities to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 nonaccredited investors under Rule 506.

The Securities Act of 1933 provides an exemption from registration for offers and sales of securities made only to accredited investors. Federal securities laws and regulations are violated if the exemption is claimed and

The Securities Act of 1933 provides an exemption from registration for offers and sales of securities made only to accredited investors. Federal securities laws and regulations are violated if the exemption is claimed and



Answer: The SEC is not informed of exempt sales.

Under the Securities Act of 1933, an issuer that makes an initial offering of securities must give a prospectus to each potential investor. Which of the following violates federal securities laws and regulations?

Under the Securities Act of 1933, an issuer that makes an initial offering of securities must give a prospectus to each potential investor. Which of the following violates federal securities laws and regulations?



Any issuer may communicate a free-writing prospectus at any time.

Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 provides a private placement exemption from registration of a securities offering. Federal securities laws and regulations are violated if the securities are sold

Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 provides a private placement exemption from registration of a securities offering. Federal securities laws and regulations are violated if the securities are sold



Answer: In an immediate unregistered reoffering to the public.

LPCO intends to sell securities. It is organized in the state where it carries on all of its business activities. If LPCO offers the securities in reliance on Rule 147, which of the following is a violation of federal securities laws and regulations?

LPCO intends to sell securities. It is organized in the state where it carries on all of its business activities. If LPCO offers the securities in reliance on Rule 147, which of the following is a violation of federal securities laws and regulations?




Answer: LPCO makes unlimited offers to nonresidents.

Regulation A provides an exemption for issuers of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. In reliance on Regulation A, Issuer has offered $45 million of securities for sale during the current calendar year. Which of the following does not violate federal securities laws and regulations?

Regulation A provides an exemption for issuers of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. In reliance on Regulation A, Issuer has offered $45 million of securities for sale during the current calendar year. Which of the following does not violate federal securities laws and regulations?



Answer: A nonaccredited investor with annual income of $500,000 purchases $50,000 worth of the offering.

Regulation A provides an exemption for issuers of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. In reliance on Regulation A, Issuer has offered $18 million of securities for sale during the current calendar year. Which of the following violates federal securities laws and regulations?

Regulation A provides an exemption for issuers of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. In reliance on Regulation A, Issuer has offered $18 million of securities for sale during the current calendar year. Which of the following violates federal securities laws and regulations?



Answer: Issuer does not register under state blue-sky laws.

Regulation A provides an exemption for issuers of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. In reliance on Regulation A, Issuer has offered $18 million of securities for sale during the current calendar year. Which of the following violates federal securities laws and regulations?

Regulation A provides an exemption for issuers of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. In reliance on Regulation A, Issuer has offered $18 million of securities for sale during the current calendar year. Which of the following violates federal securities laws and regulations?



Answer: Sales are made before the offering statement is approved by the SEC.

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act of 2012 provides an exemption from registration of securities. The related rules issued by the SEC are known as Regulation A. Under these rules, which of the following is not an exempt offering?

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act of 2012 provides an exemption from registration of securities. The related rules issued by the SEC are known as Regulation A. Under these rules, which of the following is not an exempt offering?



Answer: An offering of $22 million is made within 12 months, each purchaser receives an offering statement, and sales may be made without approval of the offering statement by the SEC.

Corcoran, Inc.'s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange. The past year was disappointing for Corcoran. Cash flow, operating income, and net income were all significantly lower than in previous years. While discussing the financial results, Barbara Freeburg, an outside member of the board of directors, learned that Corcoran's management recorded large, one-time expenses in the last quarter of the year that related to warranty, bad-debt, environmental, and other liabilities. Management provided adequate support for the large increase in the liabilities, but Freeburg, believing liabilities were materially overstated, disagreed and resigned from the board. The large expenses recorded by Corcoran in the last quarter will most likely be reported on

Corcoran, Inc.'s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange. The past year was disappointing for Corcoran. Cash flow, operating income, and net income were all significantly lower than in previous years. While discussing the financial results, Barbara Freeburg, an outside member of the board of directors, learned that Corcoran's management recorded large, one-time expenses in the last quarter of the year that related to warranty, bad-debt, environmental, and other liabilities. Management provided adequate support for the large increase in the liabilities, but Freeburg, believing liabilities were materially overstated, disagreed and resigned from the board. The large expenses recorded by Corcoran in the last quarter will most likely be reported on



Form 10-K.

Apogee Co. has filed with the SEC for many years, and its market capitalization is $10 billion. Perigee Co. has filed continuously with the SEC for 3 years, and its market capitalization is $75 million. Which of the following is most likely a true statement about communications prior to and during a registered offering of securities?

Apogee Co. has filed with the SEC for many years, and its market capitalization is $10 billion. Perigee Co. has filed continuously with the SEC for 3 years, and its market capitalization is $75 million. Which of the following is most likely a true statement about communications prior to and during a registered offering of securities?



Only Apogee may make oral communications at any time if certain conditions are met.

Maco Limited Partnership intends to sell $6 million of its limited partnership interests. The state in which Maco was organized is also the state in which it carries on all of its business activities. If Maco intends to offer the limited partnership interests in reliance on Rule 147, the intrastate registration exception under the Securities Act of 1933, which one of the following statements is true?

Maco Limited Partnership intends to sell $6 million of its limited partnership interests. The state in which Maco was organized is also the state in which it carries on all of its business activities. If Maco intends to offer the limited partnership interests in reliance on Rule 147, the intrastate registration exception under the Securities Act of 1933, which one of the following statements is true?



Under Rule 147, certain restrictions apply to resales of the limited partnership interests by purchasers.

Zack Limited Partnership intends to sell $6 million of its limited partnership interests. Zack conducts all of its business activities in the state in which it was organized. Zack intends to use the offering proceeds to acquire municipal bonds. Which of the following statements is true concerning the offering and the registration exemptions that might be available to Zack under the Securities Act of 1933?

Zack Limited Partnership intends to sell $6 million of its limited partnership interests. Zack conducts all of its business activities in the state in which it was organized. Zack intends to use the offering proceeds to acquire municipal bonds. Which of the following statements is true concerning the offering and the registration exemptions that might be available to Zack under the Securities Act of 1933?



If Zack complies with the requirements of Regulation D, Zack may make an unlimited number of offers to sell the limited partnership interests.

Universal Corp. intends to sell its common stock to the public in an interstate offering that will be registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Under the act,

Universal Corp. intends to sell its common stock to the public in an interstate offering that will be registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Under the act,



Universal's filing of a registration statement with the SEC does not automatically result in compliance with the "blue-sky" laws of the states in which the offering will be made.

Pix Corp. is making a $60 million stock offering. Pix wants the offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. Which of the following provisions of the act would Pix have to comply with for the offering to be exempt?

Pix Corp. is making a $60 million stock offering. Pix wants the offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. Which of the following provisions of the act would Pix have to comply with for the offering to be exempt?



Regulation D, Rule 506.

Lux Limited Partnership offered $300,000 of its limited partnership interests under Rule 504 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. The securities were registered and disclosure was made under state law. Which of the following statements is true?

Lux Limited Partnership offered $300,000 of its limited partnership interests under Rule 504 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. The securities were registered and disclosure was made under state law. Which of the following statements is true?



The resale of the limited partnership interests by a purchaser will not be restricted.

Dee is the owner of 12% of the shares of common stock of D&M Corporation that she acquired in Year 1. She is the treasurer and a director of D&M. The corporation registered its securities in Year 2 and made a public offering pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. If Dee decides to sell part of her holdings in Year 9, the shares

Dee is the owner of 12% of the shares of common stock of D&M Corporation that she acquired in Year 1. She is the treasurer and a director of D&M. The corporation registered its securities in Year 2 and made a public offering pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. If Dee decides to sell part of her holdings in Year 9, the shares



Must be registered if Dee sells 50% of her shares through her broker to the public

Under the Securities Act of 1933, which of the following statements, if any, are correct regarding the purpose of registration?

Under the Securities Act of 1933, which of the following statements, if any, are correct regarding the purpose of registration?



I. The purpose of registration is to allow for the detection of management fraud and prevent a public offering of securities when management fraud is suspected.
II. The purpose of registration is to adequately and accurately disclose financial and other information upon which investors may determine the merits of securities.
II only.

Which of the following characteristics can disqualify a corporation from S corporation status?

Which of the following characteristics can disqualify a corporation from S corporation status?


A. Corporation Z has as one of its shareholders a trust that is treated as entirely owned by an individual who is a U.S. citizen.

B. Corporation M has 101 shareholders, including a husband and wife.

C. Corporation B has voting and nonvoting stock.

D. Corporation T has as its shareholders an individual, an estate, and a partnership.


Answer: D. Corporation T has as its shareholders an individual, an estate, and a partnership.

Which one of the following is not a requirement to make an S corporation election?

Which one of the following is not a requirement to make an S corporation election?


A. The corporation must have no trusts as shareholders.

B. Shareholder consent must be unanimous.

C. Only one class of stock can be outstanding.

D. The entity must be a domestic entity that elects corporation treatment under the check-the-box regulations.


Answer: A. The corporation must have no trusts as shareholders.

All of the following entities are allowed to elect S status except

All of the following entities are allowed to elect S status except


A. Domestic international sales corporation (DISC).

B. Domestic building and loan association.

C. Mutual savings bank.

D. A cooperative bank without capital stock organized and operated for mutual purposes and without profit.


Answer: A. Domestic international sales corporation (DISC).

HDF, a calendar-year corporation, began business in Year 1. HDF made a valid S corporation election on December 1, Year 2. Assuming the eligibility requirements for S corporation status continued to be met throughout Year 3, on which of the following dates did HDF's S corporation status become effective?

HDF, a calendar-year corporation, began business in Year 1. HDF made a valid S corporation election on December 1, Year 2. Assuming the eligibility requirements for S corporation status continued to be met throughout Year 3, on which of the following dates did HDF's S corporation status become effective?


A. January 1, Year 2.

B. December 1, Year 2.

C. January 1, Year 3.

D. December 1, Year 3.


Answer: C. January 1, Year 3.

Which of the following statements about qualifying shareholders of an S corporation is correct?

Which of the following statements about qualifying shareholders of an S corporation is correct?


A. A general partnership may be a shareholder.

B. Only individuals may be shareholders.

C. Individuals, estates, and certain trusts may be shareholders.

D. Nonresident aliens may be shareholders.


Answer: C. Individuals, estates, and certain trusts may be shareholders.

If a corporation's status as an S corporation is revoked or terminated after January 1, 2019, how many years is the corporation required to wait before making a new S election in the absence of IRS consent to an earlier election?

If a corporation's status as an S corporation is revoked or terminated after January 1, 2019, how many years is the corporation required to wait before making a new S election in the absence of IRS consent to an earlier election?


A. 1

B .3

C. 5

D. 10


Answer: C. 5

Which one of the following will render a corporation ineligible for S corporation status?

Which one of the following will render a corporation ineligible for S corporation status?


A. One of the shareholders is a decedent's estate.

B. One of the shareholders is a bankruptcy estate.

C. The corporation has both voting and nonvoting common stock issued and outstanding.

D. The corporation has 117 shareholders.


Answer: D. The corporation has 117 shareholders.

All of the following events will cause the termination of an S corporation's S election except

All of the following events will cause the termination of an S corporation's S election except


A. Transaction that results in over 100 shareholders.

B. Donation of stock to a tax-exempt organization under 501(c)(4).

C. Sale of stock to a resident alien.

D. Failing the passive income test for 3 consecutive years.


Answer: C. Sale of stock to a resident alien.

Mary and Paul are plumbers. They went into business together and decided that the corporation structure would be in their best interest. On January 1, 2019, they formed the M & P Corp. They did not file a Form 2553. Mary and Paul filed an 1120S return at the end of the year and paid self-employment tax on their respective shares of the income. All of the following statements are true except

Mary and Paul are plumbers. They went into business together and decided that the corporation structure would be in their best interest. On January 1, 2019, they formed the M & P Corp. They did not file a Form 2553. Mary and Paul filed an 1120S return at the end of the year and paid self-employment tax on their respective shares of the income. All of the following statements are true except


A. They are not permitted to file an 1120S return because they have not made a valid election.

B. The income distributed by a corporation is not subject to self-employment tax.

C. Mary and Paul have until March 15, 2020, to make a valid election for 2019.

D. Both Mary and Paul must sign Form 2553 to make a valid election.


Answer (C) is correct.

All of the following events would cause an S corporation to cease qualifying as an S corporation except

All of the following events would cause an S corporation to cease qualifying as an S corporation except


A. Having more than 100 shareholders.

B. Transferring its stock to a corporation.

C. Transferring its stock to a resident alien.

D. Revoking the election with the consent of shareholders who, at the time the revocation is made, hold 55% of the stock.


Answer: C. Transferring its stock to a resident alien.

Dart Corp., a calendar-year S corporation, had 60,000 shares of voting common stock and 40,000 shares of nonvoting common stock issued and outstanding. On February 23, 2019, Dart filed a revocation statement with the consent of shareholders holding 30,000 shares of its voting common stock and 5,000 shares of its nonvoting common stock. Dart's S corporation election

Dart Corp., a calendar-year S corporation, had 60,000 shares of voting common stock and 40,000 shares of nonvoting common stock issued and outstanding. On February 23, 2019, Dart filed a revocation statement with the consent of shareholders holding 30,000 shares of its voting common stock and 5,000 shares of its nonvoting common stock. Dart's S corporation election


A. Did not terminate.

B. Terminated as of January 1, 2019.

C. Terminated on February 24, 2019.

D. Terminated as of January 1, 2020.


Answer: A. Did not terminate.

On December 31, 2019, LS Corporation revoked its S election. LS Corporation had been an S corporation since its inception in 2017. When may LS Corporation reelect S corporation status without IRS consent?

On December 31, 2019, LS Corporation revoked its S election. LS Corporation had been an S corporation since its inception in 2017. When may LS Corporation reelect S corporation status without IRS consent?


Reelection Date
A. January 1, 2023

B.January 1, 2024

C. January 1, 2025

D. December 31, 2024


Answer: C. January 1, 2025

Village Corp., a calendar-year corporation, began business in 2015. Village made a valid S corporation election on December 5, 2018, with the unanimous consent of its shareholders. The eligibility requirements for S status continued to be met throughout 2019. On what date did Village's S status become effective?

Village Corp., a calendar-year corporation, began business in 2015. Village made a valid S corporation election on December 5, 2018, with the unanimous consent of its shareholders. The eligibility requirements for S status continued to be met throughout 2019. On what date did Village's S status become effective?


A. January 1, 2018.

B. January 1, 2019.

C. December 5, 2018.

D. December 5, 2019.


Answer: B. January 1, 2019.

The S corporation status would terminate at the beginning of 2020 for which of the following?

The S corporation status would terminate at the beginning of 2020 for which of the following?


A. Incorporated in 1997. First year of S status was 2015. Passive investment income equaled 29% of gross receipts in 2017, 27% in 2018, and 25% in 2019. Subchapter C earnings and profits were $10,000 at the end of each year.

B. Incorporated in 1997. First year of S status was 2015. Earnings and profits from C corporation tax years of $10,000. In 2017, passive investment income equaled 35% of gross receipts. The corporation had no passive investment income in prior or later years.

C. Incorporated in 1999. First year of S status was 2016. Passive investment income equaled 27% of gross receipts in 2017, 26% in 2018, and 44% in 2019. Subchapter C earnings and profits were $10,000 at the end of each year.

D. Incorporated in 1999. First year of S status was 2014. Passive investment income equaled 19% of gross receipts in 2017, 34% in 2018, and 35% in 2019.


Answer (C)

Which of the following statements about the termination or revocation of an election to be taxed as an S corporation is true?

Which of the following statements about the termination or revocation of an election to be taxed as an S corporation is true?


A. Once an election is revoked, a new election cannot be made for 3 years.

B. The occurrence of an event that terminates an S corporation election causes the election to be revoked as of the first day of the taxable year.

C. The termination of an S corporation election causes all prior-year losses that have not been deducted by the shareholders to be lost.

D. Having passive investment income of more than 25% of gross receipts in its initial year will not result in the termination of a corporation's status as an S corporation.


Answer: D. Having passive investment income of more than 25% of gross receipts in its initial year will not result in the termination of a corporation's status as an S corporation.

Which of the following events could cause an S corporation to cease to qualify as an S corporation?

Which of the following events could cause an S corporation to cease to qualify as an S corporation?


A. The S corporation transfers its stock to a corporation or partnership.

B. A shareholder has zero basis in his stock.

C. A 25% shareholder sells his shares to an individual who wants to revoke the corporation's S status.

D. The corporation is liable for tax on excess net passive investment income for 2 consecutive years.


Answer: A. The S corporation transfers its stock to a corporation or partnership.

All of the following will result in the termination of a corporation's status as an S corporation except

All of the following will result in the termination of a corporation's status as an S corporation except


A. Transferring stock to a partnership.

B. Having over 100 shareholders.

C. Having passive investment income of more than 25% of gross receipts in its initial year.

D. Creating a second class of common stock in its initial year.


Answer: C. Having passive investment income of more than 25% of gross receipts in its initial year.

Assuming all other requirements are met, a corporation may elect to be treated as an S corporation under the Internal Revenue Code if it has

Assuming all other requirements are met, a corporation may elect to be treated as an S corporation under the Internal Revenue Code if it has


A. Both common and preferred shareholders.

B. A partnership as a shareholder.

C. One hundred or fewer shareholders.

D. The consent of a majority of the shareholders.


Answer: C. One hundred or fewer shareholders.

Which of the following tax years may an S corporation use for its current taxable year (assuming no business purpose exists for another year and assuming an election is not made under Sec. 444)?

Which of the following tax years may an S corporation use for its current taxable year (assuming no business purpose exists for another year and assuming an election is not made under Sec. 444)?


A. A calendar year.

B. A year ending in the last quarter of the calendar year.

C. The same year as the majority of its shareholders.

D. Any year it has already used before.


Answer: A. A calendar year.

Which of the following will prevent a corporation from qualifying as an S corporation?

Which of the following will prevent a corporation from qualifying as an S corporation?


A. Deriving more than 40% of its gross receipts from passive income sources.

B. Having a partnership as a shareholder.

C. Owning more than 50% of the stock of a domestic corporation.

D. Having 100 shareholders.


Answer: B. Having a partnership as a shareholder.

Which one of the following conditions will prevent a corporation from making a valid S election?

Which one of the following conditions will prevent a corporation from making a valid S election?


A. A corporation that has an estate as a shareholder.

B. A corporation that is a member of an affiliated group.

C. A corporation that has only one class of stock.

D. A corporation that has nonresident aliens as shareholders.


Answer: D. A corporation that has nonresident aliens as shareholders.

Zinco Corp. was a calendar-year S corporation. Zinco's S status terminated on April 1, 2019, when Case Corp. became a shareholder. During 2019 (365-day calendar year), Zinco had nonseparately computed income of $310,250. If no election was made by Zinco, what amount of the income, if any, was allocated to the S corporation short year for 2019?

Zinco Corp. was a calendar-year S corporation. Zinco's S status terminated on April 1, 2019, when Case Corp. became a shareholder. During 2019 (365-day calendar year), Zinco had nonseparately computed income of $310,250. If no election was made by Zinco, what amount of the income, if any, was allocated to the S corporation short year for 2019?


A.$233,750

B.$155,125

C.$76,500

D.$0


Answer: C. $76,500

Lindal Corporation, organized in 2019, immediately filed an election for S corporation status under the rules of Subchapter S. What is the maximum amount of passive investment income that Lindal will be allowed to earn and still qualify as an S corporation?

Lindal Corporation, organized in 2019, immediately filed an election for S corporation status under the rules of Subchapter S. What is the maximum amount of passive investment income that Lindal will be allowed to earn and still qualify as an S corporation?


A.80% of gross receipts.

B.50% of gross receipts.

C.20% of gross receipts.

D.No limit on passive investment income.


Answer: D. No limit on passive investment income.

An S corporation has 30,000 shares of voting common stock and 20,000 shares of nonvoting common stock issued and outstanding. The S election can be revoked voluntarily with the consent of the shareholders holding, on the day of the revocation,

An S corporation has 30,000 shares of voting common stock and 20,000 shares of nonvoting common stock issued and outstanding. The S election can be revoked voluntarily with the consent of the shareholders holding, on the day of the revocation,


Shares of Shares of:

Voting Stock Nonvoting Stock
A. 0 20,000
B. 7,500 5,000
C. 10,000 16,000
D. 20,000 0


Answer: C. 10,000 16,000

On February 10, 2019, Ace Corp., a calendar-year corporation, elected S corporation status, and all shareholders consented to the election. There was no change in shareholders in 2019. Ace met all eligibility requirements for S status during the pre-election portion of the year. What is the earliest date on which Ace can be recognized as an S corporation?

On February 10, 2019, Ace Corp., a calendar-year corporation, elected S corporation status, and all shareholders consented to the election. There was no change in shareholders in 2019. Ace met all eligibility requirements for S status during the pre-election portion of the year. What is the earliest date on which Ace can be recognized as an S corporation?


A. February 10, 2019.

B. February 10, 2020.

C. January 1, 2020.

D. January 1, 2019.


Answer: D. January 1, 2019.

Top Corp., which has been operating since 2000, has an October 31 year end, which coincides with its natural business year. On May 15, 2019, Top filed the required form to elect S corporation status. All of Top's shareholders consented to the election, and all other requirements were met. The earliest date that Top can be recognized as an S corporation is

Top Corp., which has been operating since 2000, has an October 31 year end, which coincides with its natural business year. On May 15, 2019, Top filed the required form to elect S corporation status. All of Top's shareholders consented to the election, and all other requirements were met. The earliest date that Top can be recognized as an S corporation is


A. November 1, 2018.

B. May 15, 2019.

C. November 1, 2019.

D. November 1, 2020.


Answer: C. November 1, 2019.

Which of the following conditions will prevent a corporation from qualifying as an S corporation?

Which of the following conditions will prevent a corporation from qualifying as an S corporation?


A. The corporation has both common and preferred stock.

B. The corporation has one class of stock with different voting rights.

C. One shareholder is an estate.

D.One shareholder is a grantor trust.


Answer: A. The corporation has both common and preferred stock.

Bristol Corp. was formed as a C corporation on January 1, 1985, and elected S corporation status on January 1, 1991. At the time of the election, Bristol had accumulated C corporation earnings and profits that have not been distributed. Bristol has had the same 25 shareholders throughout its existence. In 2019, Bristol's S election will terminate if it

Bristol Corp. was formed as a C corporation on January 1, 1985, and elected S corporation status on January 1, 1991. At the time of the election, Bristol had accumulated C corporation earnings and profits that have not been distributed. Bristol has had the same 25 shareholders throughout its existence. In 2019, Bristol's S election will terminate if it


A. Increases the number of shareholders to 50.

B. Adds a decedent's estate as a shareholder to the existing shareholders.

C. Takes a charitable contribution deduction.

D. Has passive investment income exceeding 90% of gross receipts in each of the 3 consecutive years ending December 31, 2019.


Answer: D. Has passive investment income exceeding 90% of gross receipts in each of the 3 consecutive years ending December 31, 2019.